
E.D. Kain of the Ordinary Gentlemen blog lays it all out for us:
And yes, even though it may cause healthcare reform to die in its tracks, I still think that the right person won in Massachusetts. I also think that there are ways the Democrats could scale back reform and get some conservatives on board with a much more modest, more market-friendly reform that still helps a lot of people who need help.Earth to E.D. Kain: the health care reform bill in the Senate was modest and market-friendly. It was not socialized medicine. It was not a single-payer system. It didn't even include a public option. It was about the most anemic excuse for "reform" ever to come out of Washington -- and that's saying something.
Does Kain really believe the Republicans would have voted for a more modest bill?
Kain and his fellow Republicans claim that they are not advocating obstructionism except as a way to protect the Constitution from the machinations of Obama and his socialist agenda.
So let's put that idea to the test.
Here's what I propose: let's go through the Constitution, line by line, and look for the word "filibuster". If the Constitution doesn't provide for it, it doesn't exist, so our strict-constructionist friends on the right claim. So maybe we can dispense with this nonsense that a supermajority is required to pass legislation in the Senate.